Review: ‘Darkest Hour’ Delivers Far More Than Mere Adequacy

Aaron Neuwirth reviews Darkest Hour, the Winston Churchill biopic that finds Gary Oldman portraying the famed British Prime Minister.

It’s not often I am surprised by the quality of a film these days, so it means something when I am caught off guard by how much I enjoy certain features. Darkest Hour is a great example, as the film is a rousing success for a variety of reasons. Not only does it get over the hill of difficulty I have in finding interest in measured biopics about historical white men portrayed by actors doing a decent impression, it also made me excited. This Winston Churchill biopic keeps a tight focus on one particular time in the Prime Minister’s life and it all serves as a buildup to one of his early triumphs, let alone establishing why the man became one of the most important British figures of all time.

Gary Oldman has taken on the role of Churchill in a move that would almost seem obvious, were Oldman to have more of a resemblance to the man. Thanks to some elaborate make-up effects, the film pulls off the tricky task of bringing Churchill to life without completely removing Oldman. Fortunately, this performance is a complete success. Within minutes, I was no longer concerned with viewing Oldman’s take as stunt casting. It became what it is, a compelling piece of work that captures the essence required for the sake of this story.

Darkest Hour revolves around the actions taken by Churchill during the early days of WWII and his recent induction as the British Prime Minister. Specifically, the film deals with the moves he needed to make to gain respect from the Parliament and the decisions he made to help the soldiers stranded on the beaches of Dunkirk. The events of this film may not be a precise depiction of what happened, but similar to Steve Jobs, this movie is more about examining the state of mind of the leading players involved at this time. It allows for more dynamic drama by relating to an audience why Churchill’s actions and general presence was controversial for many.

 

Describing the film already seems like it’s doing a disservice to those who are not ready to geek out on history lessons and fancy costume dramas. Director Joe Wright recognizes this and thanks to a sharp script by Anthony McCarten, Darkest Hour is more than just a stoic piece of work that has characters occasionally yelling at each other. This film is very entertaining. It has many funny moments and is never short of visual splendor.

I’ve been a fan of Wrights thanks to the way he tends to over-direct. His ambition has sometimes exceeded his grasp on the material, but his best films (Atonement, Hanna) and most interesting efforts (Anna Karenina) have had more than enough going on to project his take of cinema out to an audience. Darkest Hour succeeds from a visual standpoint thanks to superb cinematography by Bruno Delbonnel. An intense amount of atmosphere finds meeting rooms, tunnels, and courts awash with smoke and natural light. Scenes that move beyond England do their best to convey the stakes Churchill is dealing with. All of this is enhanced by another fine score from Wright’s regular composer Dario Marianelli.

Speaking back to the entertainment value, there is a particular joy that comes from seeing Oldman’s Churchill project so much of his personality on those around him. He’s a strong-willed man with convictions he does not give up on, but he also has a great sense of humor. The film does not become a comedy of errors, but there are more than a few awkward exchanges thanks to Churchill’s interactions with supporting players such as Ben Mendelsohn as King George VI or Lily James as Elizabeth, Churchill’s latest secretary.

The only other character that has a say over Churchill is his wife, Clementine (Kristin Scott Thomas). It’s the sort of stock role you get in these biopics when it comes to hearing what a wife has to say in the midst of a movie about men discussing all the essential drama. It’s the film’s one weakness, as Thomas brings all she has to offer, but Darkest Hour has little for her to do beyond cheering up her husband or expressing some mild apprehension on his insistence to accept nothing but victory.

More interesting work comes from the conversations, arguments, and power plays sparked by Churchill’s opponents. Stephen Dillane does a great job as Lord Halifax, a man outright opposing Churchill’s thoughts on how to handle the war. Ronald Pickup is also quite good as former Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who has similar qualms with Churchill. Were this coming from In The Loop and Veep creator Armando Iannucci, you could see these scenes handled with a satirical touch (and keep a look out for that in his upcoming film The Death of Stalin). However, for Darkest Hour, disagreements are treated with genuine seriousness, and it’s because the film feels so assured in its construction that the eventual results feel that much more powerful.

It’s the challenge of making a film about a historical event where you know the outcome. This is especially the case in a year that’s already given us multiple Dunkirk-based stories (Their Finest and Dunkirk). Given that it’s the 75th anniversary of the successful Dunkirk evacuation, I can see why we are getting multiple films about a significant moment in British history.

With that in mind, there is still a sense of accomplishment that comes with being wrapped up in a story that not only tackles this specific point in history but addresses the problem using thoughts (and some well-placed famous Churchill quotes) that still apply today. This may be a very British film, but there’s no real subtlety in watching scenes encouraging that a stand be taken against tyrannical leaders with too much power. There may have been more intelligence on the opposing side, compared to what people are up against today, but the message remains clear.

Darkest Hour left me with an empowering feeling about sensible, but strong actions ultimately winning out the day. It also left me more than satisfied with the joy that came from seeing what could have been a stuffy period drama. Shouting matches are balanced by humorous scenes such as a phone call between Churchill and FDR. This is the sort of film that is not so much taking risks as it is holding on to all the little natural elements that should make this story worthwhile. It is one thing to see the facts presented in front of you, but it’s another to see them delivered by multiple characters who all have speech impediments. Darkest Hour finds a way to sort through all the history and never, never, never gives up on winning its audience.

9
Amazing
Written by

Aaron is a movie fanatic and loves talking about such things…a lot. He is from Orange County, California, but earned a degree or two at UC Santa Barbara. He describes himself as a film reviewer, writer, podcaster, video game player, comic book reader, disc golfer, and a lefty. His mind is full of film knowledge and random trivia, but he is always open to learning more, whether it’s through box office stats, reviewing Blu-rays from The Criterion Collection or simply hearing first hand from filmmakers and others about various productions and behind-the-scenes tidbits.

Your Rating

0 0

Lost Password

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Sign Up